Sadr ad-Dīn Abu'l Ḥasan ʿAlī Ibn Abī al-ʻIzz () was a 14th-century Arab Muslim scholar. He was a jurist of the Hanafi school and was nicknamed Qāḍī al-Quḍāh (the Judge of Judges). He served as a qadi in Damascus and Egypt. Many who have written on his biography mentioned that he had vast knowledge, he had a high status and position, and that he was a Faqeeh (expert in Fiqh). He taught at schools and he assumed the office of judge in Damascus and then in Egypt. He is best known for authoring his magnum opus on al-Tahawi's creedal treatise Al-Aqidah al-Tahawiyyah.
Biography According to Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, Ibn Abi al-'Izz was born on 12 Dhu al-Hijjah 1331 AD/731 AH, He came from a family that had been strong supporters of the Hanafi school of jurisprudence. Īmad ad-Dīn Aṭ-Ṭartusī. His grandfather, Shams ad-Dīn (d. 722/1322) was a very distinguished Ḥanafī jurist and served as chief judge. And his great-grandfather, Muḥammad Ibn Abī Al-Īzz, taught at the school of AlMurshidīyyāh. His uncle, Ṣadr ad-Dīn Sulaymān Ibn Abī Al-Īzz (d. 677/1278), was also a great Ḥanafī scholar and writer, and served as chief judge in Syria and Egypt. Sulaymān's descendants also distinguished themselves as judges, muftis and professors
Naturally, he had learned first from his family and seems to have completed his studies with them at an early age. Ibn Qāḍī Shuhbah said that he started teaching at Qīmāzīyyāh School at the age of seventeen in the year 748. This school had been built by Sarim ad-Dīn Qa’imaz, one of the descendants of Ṣalāḥ ad-Dīn AlĀyyūbī, for teaching Ḥanafī fiqh. In 771/1369, Ibn Abī Al-Īzz moved to the Ruknīyyāh School, which was founded in 621 A.H. by Amir Rukn ad-Dīn Mankuras. In 784/1382, he started teaching at the ‘Īzzīyyāh School, founded by Abū Al-Faḍl ‘Īzz ad-Dīn Aybak (d. 645/1249), replacing Qāḍi Al-Ḥammam after the qāḍi's death. Along with teaching, Ibn Abī Al-‘Īzz also delivered sermons at the Afram Mosque (west of Aṣ-Ṣāliḥīyyāh) founded by Amir Jamal ad-Dīn Aqush Al-Afiam in 720/1320, as well as at Al-Ḥusban. Towards the end of 776/1374, he was appointed judge in Damascus in place of Qāḍi Najm ad-Dīn, his cousin, upon the latter's transfer to Egypt. But Najm ad-Dīn resigned three months later and returned to his previous post in Damascus. Ibn Abī Al-Īzz then took over as judge in Egypt, but he also resigned from that post after just two months. Upon returning to Damascus, he resumed teaching at Qīmazīyyāh and also took classes at the Jawharīyyāh School.
Ibn Abī Al-Īzz was born and bred in a family of Ḥanafī scholars and judges. All of the schools wherein he taught were dedicated to the teaching of Ḥanafī fiqh, and the judgeship he served was also that of a Ḥanafī judge. Despite all of that, he was not a blind follower of the Ḥanafī school; in fact, he was opposed to following one imām exclusively or defending the views of one school uncritically. Absolute faith and obedience, he said, is due to the Book of Allāh and the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be on him). No one is above criticism; everyone's views are to be examined based on the criteria of the Qur'an and Sunnah; if they agree with them, they should be accepted; if they disagree, they are to be rejected. This is the burden of one of his tracts, Al-Ittiba. In it, he reviewed a letter which a contemporary Ḥanafī scholar, Akmal ad-Dīn Muḥammad Ibn Maḥmūd (d. 786/1384) had written, in which he had pleaded for the exclusive following of the Ḥanafī school. Besides objecting, in principle, to this point of view, Ibn Abī Al-Īzz also noted his observations on various issues which the author discussed. He concluded his discussion by saying: The correct course for a student is to memorize Allāh’s Book and ponder it. Similarly, he should memorize the aḥādīth of the Prophet (peace be on him), as much as he can, and reflect upon them. Furthermore, he should learn Arabic and grammar to the extent that he can express himself correctly and understand the Qur'ān and Sunnah well and also the writings of the Salaf. After this, he should study the views of different scholars, starting with the Companions and then those who came after them, without making any discrimination between them. When they agree on a point, he should stick to it; but when they differ, he should study all the views with an open mind and examine their arguments. Whoever Allāh guides is on the right path and whoever He leaves wandering cannot see the light.Ibn Abī Al-Īzz was very critical of the practice of establishing schools and colleges and dedicating them to the study of a particular school of fiqh. It then became the duty of the teachers, he observed, to defend each and every view of that school. The students, too, developed the same attitude and bias. Unfortunately, most of the donors whose contributions led to the establishment of those schools had little knowledge and would explicitly leave conditions in their wills or deeds that would restrict the free exercise of intellect and open pursuit of knowledge. Ibn Abī Al-Īzz was of the opinion that such conditions should not be honored since they violate the spirit of the Qur'an and Sunnah. It was against some similar conditions that the Prophet (peace be on him) once said, “What has happened to the people that they come up with conditions that are not mentioned in the Book of Allāh! Know that all the conditions not found in the Book of Allāh, even if they be a hundred conditions, are absolutely null and void.” Ibn Abī Al-Īzz also denounced the practice that restricted judges to making rulings only according to a particular fiqh. The tradition, too, of appointing four imams, one from each school of fiqh, to lead the prayer in the House of Allāh at Makkah, he stated, should be discontinued. There should be, he argued, one imām, and everyone, irrespective of the fiqh school he followed, should pray behind him
Controversies In the year 784/1382, ‘Alī Ibn Aybak (d. 801/1398-9), a regular poet of Damascus, wrote an ode in praise of the Prophet (peace be on him) in the same meter in which the famous ode “Bānat Su‘ād” was written by Ka‘b Ibn Zuhayr. It was a poem that received general appreciation. It happened that Ibn Abī Al-‘Īzz read it and wrote a letter to the poet stating his appreciation of the literary aspect of the ode. In a separate paper, however, he also noted down his remarks about some of its ideas. Some people objected to this note and raised their voices against Ibn Abī Al-‘Īzz. Ibn Aybak referred the note to some jurists who objected to Ibn Abī Al-Izz’s remarks. The case was brought to the Sultan, who formed a council of scholars and jurists belonging to the different schools and asked for their opinion. The council held many sessions during which it questioned Ibn Abī Al-Īzz and discussed the issue at length. At the end of the fifth session, the council, led by a Shafi'ī judge, convicted Ibn Abī Al-Īzz for his views, consigned him to jail, removed him from his post, and fined him. The fine was later withdrawn but he had to spend fourteen months in jail.
The Shafi'i scholar, al-Hafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani, mentions those contemporaries who refuted Ibn Abi al-Izz when he was summoned to court to defend the matter of his creed; "He was among the most virtuous people. He suffered an ordeal that was caused by Ali ibn Aybak, the poet, who wrote a Qaseedah Nabawiyah that he opposed."In all there were eight issues on which Ibn Abī Al-Īzz was convicted. He was accused, for example, of believing that angels are better than prophets. He discussed this issue at length in this Commentary. He opened his discussion of this topic with the following words: "People have debated the question as to which is superior: angels or human beings that are pious. It is said that the Ahl As-Sunnah believe that pious men, or at least the prophets among them, are superior to the angels. The Mu'tazīlah, on the contrary, believe in the superiority of the angels. This opinion is also held by a group of the Ahl As-Sunnah and the Ṣūfīs. As for the Ash‘arīs, some have no opinion on this issue and others are inclined to believe in the superiority of the angels. Shi‘āh scholars say that all the imams are superior to the angels, and exalted some categories of men over some categories of angels, and viceversa. However, no one worth mention has said that the angels are superior to some prophets rather than others."He then goes on to say:“I was very reluctant to discuss this issue, for it does not avail much and is quite insignificant... Moreover, the Shaykh [Aṭ-Ṭaḥāwī] has not touched upon it, either negatively or positively. Probably he deliberately refrained from entering into its discussion. Imam Abū Ḥanīfah, too, kept silent when he was asked about it... Our duty is only to believe in the angels and the prophets. We are not required to believe that one of them is superior to the other. Had it been a duty, there must have been some text to guide us on this issue.” However, he does enter into a discussion, cites the arguments of those who exalt the angels and of those who exalt the prophets and then concludes, “In short, this is an unimportant issue and that is why most of the writers on the subject have not discussed it; and Abū Ḥanīfah kept silent concerning it, as we have said before.”The second issue concerning which he was accused dealt with the possibility of the prophets’ committing minor sins. All scholars of Islam are agreed that the prophets committed no mistakes with respect to communicating to their people what God revealed to them. Similarly, they are agreed that prophets did not commit grave sins. But they differ on the question of whether prophets may commit a small sin sometimes. Ibn Abī Al-Īzz has not discussed this issue in his Commentary. In the note which he wrote on the ode of Ibn Aybak, he upheld the possibility of prophets sometimes committing minor sins by mistake. It seems that those who indicted him even negated this possibility. If that was the case, they were going against the majority opinion. The Athari scholar Ibn Taymīyyāh wrote: "The view that the prophets do not commit grave sins and that they may commit small sins is the view of most scholars of Islām and most of their followers. One can say that this is the view of the majority of the theologians." Abū Al-Ḥassan Al-Amidī has noted that this is the view of the majority of the Ash'arī theologians as well as the majority of the scholars of Qur'anic exegesis, ḥadīth and fiqh. What has come down from the Salaf, the imams, the Companions, the Successors and their successors, is not different from this view.