The Zurich model is the approach by the city of Zurich, Switzerland, which allows its public transportation system to achieve and maintain a high market share. Many other cities have emulated elements of it, especially when new tram or light rail systems were introduced.
History In the 1970s, Zurich was planning to move many of the tram lines in its central area into tunnels. This project was rejected in a referendum. In the 1970s, a project to create an underground railway was similarly rejected.
Despite the failures of these attempts to provide Zurich with a different kind of transportation system, public transportation in Zurich has maintained a high modal split, with 65% of people commuting within the city doing so by public transport and only 17% using cars. In his book Status Anxiety, Alain de Botton has suggested why the model is so effective:
Elements of the model
The model has the following characteristics: A dense network providing many direct connections and short headways at stations/stops. Higher priority for public transportation at road intersections (controlled by traffic lights). Low impact of road congestion on operations (through separate bus lanes and tram tracks). Parking maximums (introduced in 1989), followed by parking limits in the downtown area (1996).
Public transport entities
The public transportation system in the city of Zurich consists of the following elements, which are part of the Zurich transportation network (Zürcher Verkehrsverbund, ZVV):
Verkehrsbetriebe Zürich (VBZ) Dolderbahn, a rack railway Funicular Rigiblick Polybahn, a funicular Trams in Zurich Trolleybuses in Zurich Motor buses of VBZ, VBG, PostAuto, AVA and AZZK Zurich S-Bahn, a commuter rail and rapid transit hybrid system serving all 28 railway stations in the city (and linking them with other stations within the Zurich Metropolitan Area) Lake Zurich navigation company (ZSG), operating on Lake Zurich and the river Limmat
See also Health impact of light rail systems Finnish models of public transport Karlsruhe model Melbourne Principles
References